Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House Resolution 2600

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

House Resolution 2600 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable law; sources in article are only the congressional record and a blog from Lance's official senate website. Fine sources for information, but not for notability. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United States of America. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nomination. No reason for notability is given in the article, and the law is obscure, run-of-the-mill. TH1980 (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - apparently, this was not passed. What's worse, is that the same number has been used for two other bills. This page's existence is likely to cause significant confusion amongst our core readership. Bearian (talk) 19:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete - I certainly agree no article should exist at this title. The most-used referrant for the bill appears to be the PABI Plan Act. If we do choose to delete this article, I'll probably create PABI Plan Act as a new redirect to The Sarah Jane Brain Foundation. (Or, we could move the article to PABI Plan Act and then redirect as an WP:ATD.) In my search, I found basic news coverage[1][2][3][4], opinions[5][6] (including from the primary advocate[7]), and press releases e.g. from various health orgs.[8][9] Obviously, only the basic news coverage is relevant for WP:GNG. As it appears to have only attracted coverage from regional news sources, I'm leaning toward delete. But a more thorough search (I only used basic Google, not any news archives) might uncover more coverage. Suriname0 (talk) 16:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Randall, Judy L. (2012-04-24). "Staten Island's Malliotakis out to snip red tape for business". silive. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  2. ^ Collins, Lois M. (2012-02-26). "TBI crisis: As evidence mounts of effects of brain injuries on children, financing lags and Congress considers a bill". Deseret News. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  3. ^ Lynch, Danielle (2011-09-05). "Legislation takes aim at child brain injuries". Delaware County Daily Times. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  4. ^ Kurosu, Jason. "Legislators, Medical Pros Back PABI Plan Act". Crescenta Valley Weekly. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  5. ^ Sears, Craig (2012-04-30). "Working nationally to standardize treatment of pediatric acquired brain injuries". The Hour. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  6. ^ Grady, Thomas F. (2011-11-10). "Opinion: More support needed for National Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury Plan Act". nj. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  7. ^ Donohue, Patrick. "Donohue: Get serious about brain injuries". MetroWest Daily News. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  8. ^ "Congressman Lance Introduces National Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury Plan Act". TAPinto. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  9. ^ "Turner Joins Sarah Jane Brain Foundation At City Hall". The Wave. 2012-04-27. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.