- Mar 28, 2021
- 227
- 6,019
For all the people here that wait (im)patiently to see much more of the lady we all admire and adore there are only 4 (four) nude pics that possibly, hopefully show her. (See page before)
. And we have a witness who states "There are some hot pics. Have saw a couple of nudes but it has been years ago"
So there are such pics. But what about the ones posted here? Witness: "Not sure about the pic without bottoms on but the boob pics are 100% her"
So far, so good. Let's put the boobs aside for a moment and concentrate on the lower regions. HER lower region? Obviously very hard to prove or disprove - even Mr Holmes couldn't say 'Elementary, my dear Warson'
I've tried to sift all the evidence and was able to find some clues (BTW: If you're beginning to yawn you may stop reading).
(Exhibit 1)
IS it HER?
AGAINST : Look at the pubic hair. It doesn't seem to be shaved or trimmed. But is it reasonable to assume that a woman like our idol with all that beautiful dark hair has such soft and sparse pubic hair?
FOR:
(Exhibit 2)
We can see that she has an ample body and soft belly, not unlike exhibit 1
What's more: A closer look reveals some tanlines in pic 1 that are very narrow. No doubt the narrow bikini bottom in pic 2 could result in just these tanlines. And I can assure you that other photos prove she prefers such bottoms.
(Exhibit 3, 4, 5)
You must study the feet by comparing pic 3 and 5 (open them so they are bigger)
Evidence: the nails are not painted, and I was not able to find a single photo of HER with painted nails.
Although pic 3 is not too clear we can see IMO some striking similarities. The big toes are unusually big. The relative lenghths of the other toes are the same. And, above all, the smallest toe (see left foot) is much shorter and looks a little deformed, ending in a very small nail.
There's even the bigger gap between toe 3 and 4.
So what do we make of all this?
A 100% proof could not be expected. But to me who had dismissed this photo with a shrug it is more interesting now. My expert opinion: a probability of 80 % that it's the adored one.
The unavoidable question: What do you think? Is it all wishful thinking?
If so: IT WAS FUN!!
. And we have a witness who states "There are some hot pics. Have saw a couple of nudes but it has been years ago"
So there are such pics. But what about the ones posted here? Witness: "Not sure about the pic without bottoms on but the boob pics are 100% her"
So far, so good. Let's put the boobs aside for a moment and concentrate on the lower regions. HER lower region? Obviously very hard to prove or disprove - even Mr Holmes couldn't say 'Elementary, my dear Warson'
I've tried to sift all the evidence and was able to find some clues (BTW: If you're beginning to yawn you may stop reading).
(Exhibit 1)
You must be registered for see images attach
IS it HER?
AGAINST : Look at the pubic hair. It doesn't seem to be shaved or trimmed. But is it reasonable to assume that a woman like our idol with all that beautiful dark hair has such soft and sparse pubic hair?
FOR:
(Exhibit 2)
You must be registered for see images attach
We can see that she has an ample body and soft belly, not unlike exhibit 1
What's more: A closer look reveals some tanlines in pic 1 that are very narrow. No doubt the narrow bikini bottom in pic 2 could result in just these tanlines. And I can assure you that other photos prove she prefers such bottoms.
(Exhibit 3, 4, 5)
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
You must study the feet by comparing pic 3 and 5 (open them so they are bigger)
Evidence: the nails are not painted, and I was not able to find a single photo of HER with painted nails.
Although pic 3 is not too clear we can see IMO some striking similarities. The big toes are unusually big. The relative lenghths of the other toes are the same. And, above all, the smallest toe (see left foot) is much shorter and looks a little deformed, ending in a very small nail.
There's even the bigger gap between toe 3 and 4.
So what do we make of all this?
A 100% proof could not be expected. But to me who had dismissed this photo with a shrug it is more interesting now. My expert opinion: a probability of 80 % that it's the adored one.
The unavoidable question: What do you think? Is it all wishful thinking?
If so: IT WAS FUN!!
